The use of historic cell site evidence doesn't require it to pinpoint
the exact spot where the mobile phone was used. The evidential
supporting materials do have to stack up though but at the same time
avoid assumptions being made on "thin" evidence.
Circumstantial evidence - mobile phone /giffgaff / cell site:
http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/1916.html
Location and Mast Usage
http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/scot/cases/ScotHC/2013/2013HCJAC89.html
GSM(2G)-GPRS(2.5G)-HSCSD/EDGE-WCDMA(3G/UMTS)-HSPA/LTE(3.5G)-LTE-A(4G)- 5G/IoT- 802.11xx-WiMAX, plus other radio & paging technologies: Analysis of Call Record Attribution, Network Record, Coverage, Masts, Location, Co-location, Movement for Commercial and In Building Solutions, Public and Tribunal Inquiries, Criminal Cases, Civil Cases, Human Rights and Investigation into tracking, lost and missing persons...
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Location Tracking in the US
We have all read various views expressed by those involved in the US
that location data are not kept and it is all too difficult to get any
sort of data. Have a read of the article below and maybe ask yourself if
the authors of this article are aware that such location data does
exists and are retained why others have expressed in other forums such
data doesn't exist or if the data did exist the location data isn't
retained.
Government Location Tracking: Cell Phones, GPS Devices, and License Plate Readers:
https://www.aclu.org/government-location-tracking-cell-phones-gps-devices-and-license-plate-readers
Government Location Tracking: Cell Phones, GPS Devices, and License Plate Readers:
https://www.aclu.org/government-location-tracking-cell-phones-gps-devices-and-license-plate-readers
Labels:
cell details,
cell site analysis,
data retention,
evidence,
location,
tracking,
US
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)