CSA and seamless roaming

CSA and seamless roaming

UK seamless roaming on the H3G to O2 and H3G to Orange always added further dimensions needing to be investigated when conducting cell site analysis (CSA). However, with Orange's announcement today (08/10/10), sent by text message to its customers, will mean extending seamless roaming investigations now to Orange and T-Mobile too.

https://kareena.orange.co.uk/share/

Call and text in even more places

Now you can pick up a signal from both the Orange and T-Mobile networks in the UK which means that you can call and text in even more places.

• Your phone will use T-Mobile signal if it doesn't pick up an Orange signal
• Your charges stay the same when you use T-Mobile signal
• Nothing else will change, you'll just get more network coverage

This provides further corroboration that simplifying investigations and not spending the appropriate time conducting radio tests and cross-referencing to the appropriate network records can lead to erroneous findings and reported flawed opinions to the client and court.

Orange and Vodka - mixing mobile networks

Orange and Vodka - mixing mobile networks

(shaken, not stirred)

.

Good title for a book or article that heading. I thought this would be a useful post regarding the unusual occurrence of roaming onto a forbidden UK network from the home UK network.These screenshots record an event that happened on my wireless broadband. In the area I was located at the time Orange provided GPRS at 56K but download rates of under 6.5kbps (no 3G) - so not very good at all.
.

.
Such a matter like this may have an influence, if understood that it may occur, on any post-obtained radio test measurements after an alleged crime, or may even taint what may be considered a flawless opinion or conclusion, that is when conducting cell site analysis (CSA) investigations for evidential purposes.

.

.
It is not the fact that post-obtained radio test measurements failed to replicate an earlier event, it is the fact that a 'possibility' that may need to be explored to provide a more rounded opinion or conclusion in a report and at Court maybe missed or overlooked.
.
There are answers to the above conundrum but this is not the point of this post, which has been to highlight a technical event that might impact on evidence.