Showing posts with label single cell predication maps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label single cell predication maps. Show all posts

Sunday, January 27, 2019

Cell Site Analysis - location and radio coverage signals

It still holds true with LTE radio coverage that signals arrive in a scattered manner detected at the mobile phone handset. A good CSA investigator will know how to explain how coverage might inconceivably be thought by the untrained not to be detected at a particular location, may well be possible due to the location of the phone at the material time.
 
As mentioned in a previous post understanding density of masts in an area must equally be understood not simply from the point of calls handled by a single mast. There is also the instance where a call's start and end masts are different that can be involved, which may involve the network having to deal with 'hard handover'. Advancements with 3G and 4G enables calls (data) being handled by several masts delivering data to the smartphone in a seamless fashion. This maybe due to the amount of data involved or fast-fading etc. These types of handovers are called 'soft-handover'. When understood correctly the use of these combined masts in soft-handover because they are often in very close proximity can narrow down the location through improved triangulation (etc.). 
 
 
There is the occasion where the operator only has one mast in a particular area but several sectors of the same mast might be used seamlessly for an e.g. data call, and this is called softer-handover. When thinking about soft and softer handover think in terms of 'inter' and 'intra'.
 
 
 
Furthermore, smartphones, which I call 'ultra-smarts' due to their increased embedded communications capabilities, use close proximity masts or access points (Wi-Fi) to enable uninterrupted communication and network access. Network operators have deployed microcells, as you (may) know. Microcells deployment help remove the burden of signalling and traffic on macro-cells by directing slow-moving mobiles to short range coverage. These microcells can be useful for slow-moving users, walking down the high street or located in one area for a period of time. Remaining in an area for a period of time is called 'dwell time'. The latter is a term CSA investigators should know as it can have important bearing upon a case. In some instances, small coverage points have been deployed called pico-cells and nano-cells which can refine location distances between the mobile phone and the cell to a few meters.
 
The 'ultra-smarts' Wi-Fi capability creates an additional attractive proposition for cell site analysis investigations as the investigator will need to be keenly aware that dual usage of cellular and Wi-Fi coverage can produce a rich resource of location positioning. The image below has been used at this blog before but it is still a useful reminder what should be considered when conducting radio surveys.
 
 
And if further illustration is needed to illuminate a survey assessment criteria then hopefully this image below will provide the investigator with some ideas.
 
 
Cell site analysis has evolved so much more from the days of GSM and early days of WCDMA. It is not enough to use call records and CDRs in isolation and/or going to a particular geographical location to conduct tests at one single location; the wider area needs to be taken into context as to what impact that might have on a call or calls being handled by a cell or cells etc. (mast, masts or access points).
 

Friday, June 18, 2010

Cell Site Analysis (CSA) Images

Cell Site Analysis (CSA) Images
.
Cell Site Analysis (CSA) has had a good deal of airing recently here on the forum, so I thought you might like to see images from the work that I get involved.
.

Image 1
.
Image 1 is one slide from the training course material to introduce students to CSA when starting out discussing radio test measurements. It should be noted that this image represents less than 1% of all data acquired during radio test measurements.
.
Image 2
.
I thought it would be useful to include this Terrain and Clutter Map (Image 2) as I use this software to assist me in complex cases. Terrain and Clutter are discussed during training and as it was a topic of the discussion about UK Criminal Evidence Delays I thought it would be helpful to let forum members see that I am not referring to theoretical matters, terrain and clutter analysis actually takes place.
.
Image 3
.
It is essential to understand, when conducting radio test measurements, that just because radio signals can travel some distance from a particular Mast (Image 3) that coverage should not be dismissed or excluded. Operators set threshold limits, hard limits and boundary limits. It does not follow that just because a mobile is in the Green area shown in the Single Cell Prediction Map that the mobile will be excluded from using that coverage.
.
Do you remember the discussion that I put up here CSA: Mobile Phones and Fringe Coverage?:
.
Image 4
.
Best serving coverage is often posed as the deal-clincher to suggest the mobile phone was most likely or consistent with being at a particular location. There can be numerous points that could (and I say 'could' advisedly) point to best server coverage being used but rarely does it come up in evidence because the radio content in evidence rarely gets disclosed these days.
.
It is possible with best serving coverage that it can induce a negative outcome that may prevent calls taking place, so it is always important to see the other side of the coin, so to speak:
.
GSM Radio Test Measurements Non-Dominance
GSM Radio Test Measurements

.
I hope the above provides a further illustration of how smart and intelligent a science Cell Site Analysis really is and that by not applying it properly and dumbing down this art of this forensic science:
.
- is not only a great loss to the law of evidence
- it reduces the examiner's/expert's knowledge and understanding about the subject with which they are dealing - mobile telephone evidence.